Showing posts with label Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. Show all posts

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Note to farc: RELEASE THE GIRL. WITHOUT CONDITIONS. RIGHT NOW!

Nhora Valentina Muñoz is a 10-year old girl, yet she might be (outrageously) considered a “political hostage” and the payment of a ransom is even (unreasonably) expected. Why? It is not because she’s the daughter of the mayor of a small town in the northeastern part of Colombia. It is because the revolutionary armed forces of Colombia, a.k.a. farc frigging said so.

The almost 60-year old guerrilla does what it wants and there is not accountability to its horrendous crimes. It looks that when the guerilla is nearing to a negotiation of a peace treaty (as they are surreptitiously doing it now), it has to find a way to shock the public opinion and turn it against it. And boy they always find a (gory, revolting) way.

Horrendous crimes like the killing of a very old and beloved priest, the denial of the release of a kidnapped officer whose child was dying of cancer, and other alike criminal gestures preceded the abrupt ending of peace talks. If the guerilla honchos think that shows their strength at the negotiating table, they should have learned by now those actions only show their brutality, their inhumanity and their unwillingness to negotiate but to gain time, influence and terrain to control while sitting at the table.

Juan Manuel Santos, the current Colombian president, knows that the Colombians are not in the mood for a peace talk after the utter failure of the last effort the Pastrana administration made to reach the cherished goal. Colombians elected Alvaro Uribe Vélez to treat the guerilla with an iron fist and after he left office, they still want a defeated guerilla, not a negotiating one. Yet Santos tries to find a way to initiate peace talks with the highest secrecy. And the kidnapping of 10-year old girl shows pretty clearly which are the intentions of the guerilla, and most jaw dropping, they haven’t changed a bit in almost 60 years.


RELEASE THE GIRL. WITHOUT CONDITIONS. RIGHT NOW!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Did America waste $5 billion in Colombia?


By Dr. sipmac

"See you at the cities", said "Mono" Jojoy, number 3 at the farc at the very heyday of the failed peace talks in the Pastrana administration. Politicians, bankers and clergymen from all over the world, NYSE's chairman included, visited San Vicente del Caguan or received Raul Reyes (number two in the organization) in a trip with colombian government officials to Europe. Just everybody wanted to be in the history books. ¿And what was what the farc had to offer? Just to extend the war from the jungle to the colombian cities, where the most part of the population live. And in the late nineties, they were in pretty good shape to do that (they've got a lot of help btw, even from outside Colombia).

That was between 1999 and 2002, and then the tide turns against the farc: Reyes is killed, the organization is in disarray, Jojoy is on the run and Tirofijo, the legendary leader died without being nearer to his final goal: to size absolute power in Colombia.

Now, today Dr. sipmac read an article written by Mr. Ray Fisman about 5 billion dollars wasted in the war against drugs in Colombia. The article is based in a Center for Global Development report. Sip won't go into the legalization debate, not for now. But Mr. Fisman surely does not mention how was the situation in the late nineties: it was more than possible that the guerrilla could win the war. Because it wasn't only a guerrilla war but pure terrorism used against innocent civilians, too. Anybody who cared to travel by car or by bus outside the big cities risked dear life by being caught by guerrilleros, and spent years kidnapped, for starters.

In a nutshell, this situation changed thanks to the U.S. aid, those 5 billion dollars reported in Mr. Fisman's article and allegedly to have no positive outcome after being spent. It is interesting how it is mentioned both in the CGD report and the article the truly evil (and very condemnable) deeds of the paramilitary forces but not all the damage caused by the guerrilla all these years. Not to mention that in Wikipedia's entry on CGD it is mentioned the Foreign Policy Magazine, the one that works very closely with Slate, all with the same political orientation.

All of this is to say, the U.S. aid to Colombia may have not been 100% succesful, but it has done a lot of good to the majority of colombians that want to live in peace, and they are thankful for this. Dr. sipmac remembers about one or two years ago an american cartoonist horrified by the colombian paramilitary and asked not to drink colombian coffee. I'd rather been suggesting him not to blow any coke.
Enhanced by Zemanta