Showing posts with label Fox News Channel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fox News Channel. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Romney won the second debate (according to Fox News) - but wait, there's more!

Yeah, every warm body that reads the New York Times and watches MSNBC knows Fox News is "false and unreliable", not "fair and balanced." Yeah, every person fed on the MSM fountain knows it's filled with hateful conservatives and republicans (but nobody seems to realize it's filled with card-carrying liberals, too). And Rupert Murdoch (he's eeeeeeeeeeeeevil, you know).

But Fox News knows its audience: it's already in the tank for Romney. The Fox News-junkies don't need reassurances, they are energized enough and they wouldn't have been demoralized if Romney would have really lost the second debate. They will go out and vote on November 6th, with a vengeance.

Now, consider this (if you are still here). Full Disclosure: Romney wasn't my favorite candidate in the Republican primaries:

Romney won the second debate | Fox News: But the key reason for the Romney win was substantive:

1. Romney made very clear the case against Obama's economic record and Obama's rebuttal about 5 million jobs was pathetic.

2. Romney injected the China issue, big time, and tapped into a strong public sentiment on the issue.

3. Romney made the effective case that Obama is anti-oil, coal, and gas and that this has doubled gas prices.

4. Romney was very effective in differentiating himself from Bush-43 and in establishing that, unlike the GOP of the past, he was for small businesses not big businesses

5. Romney rebutted the attacks on him over Chinese investments.

6. Romney explained his tax plan well and to everyone's satisfaction.

7. Obama erred in trying to make us believe that he always felt Libya was a terror attack. We all heard him blame the movie.

Obama scored points over the 47% statement by Romney, immigration, and by his response to the accusation that he went to Vegas after the murder of the Ambassador.
But wait, there's more! Wayne Allyn Root, Vegas oddmaker predicts a landslide victory for Romney and argues that:
* The news media is ignoring signs of mass revulsion towards President Obama. In the West Virginia Democrat primary, a felon got 40% of the vote versus Obama. In deep blue Massachusetts and Connecticut, GOP Senate candidates are even, or leading in recent polls. In pro-union Wisconsin, Walker won by a country mile. But worst of all for Mr. Obama, several recent polls show Romney competitive in Illinois -- Obama’s home state. Romney is actually winning by a landslide in the suburbs of Obama’s Chicago. Even in Cook County, the country’s biggest Democratic stronghold, Romney leads by double digits among independents (43-31) and white voters (53-40). These are very bad signs for Obama.
*  In 2008 Democrats overwhelmingly controlled the majority of governorships. Today Republicans control the majority of Governorships. Presidential elections are always steered in each state by the governor -- the most powerful force in state politics.

 *  After the 2010 census, electoral votes were added to states that lean Republican in elections: Texas, Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, South Carolina, and Utah. Deep blue Democrat states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, and Massachusetts lost electoral votes.

*  That brings up an interesting point. Why is everyone running away from these ultra liberal, high tax states in the first place? Isn’t that alone proof of the failure of Democrat ideas?

*  Next, follow the money trail. Yes, Obama is raising plenty of money, although there is now a major question about whether it's coming from illegal foreign contributors. But forget all that. What matters is that in 2008 Obama overwhelmed McCain by out-spending him 10 to 1 down the stretch. That won’t happen in 2012. Romney is even, or can out-spend Obama, in the last 2 weeks of the election. That makes a huge difference in the outcome.

*  Christians will turn out in record numbers this year. Obama has offended Christians again and again. Last election 20 million evangelical Christians did not vote. They will turn out in record numbers in 2012 to defeat the most anti-Christian President in US history. How motivated are Christians? Did you see the long lines around the country to support Chick-fil-A this summer? You’ll see those same lines on election day.

*  Voter rolls have been purged in 2012 of felons and illegals in many states -- particularly Florida and Ohio. Turnout of Democrats will be nothing like 2008.

*  Which brings up another important question. What kind of political party relies on felons and people illegally in the country to win elections?

*  The “Enthusiasm Factor” for Romney is huge. Conservatives are focused, intense, motivated, and enthusiastic. Democrats turned out for Obama in record numbers in 2008. Today they are demoralized. A big edge goes to Romney on Election Day as conservatives, white voters, middle class voters and independents turn out in record numbers for Romney.

 *  I know several people who voted for Obama in 2008, but never again.  Does anyone know a McCain voter who will vote for Obama in 2012? There are none.

* Finally, history proves that a majority of undecided voters break for the challenger. Romney will take most of the undecided voters on election day -- just like Reagan did versus Jimmy Carter in 1980. Romney’s fantastic debate performance gave them confidence to choose the challenger.
Now you can go back to your Huffington Post (if you're still here). Or come back to mock me on November the 7th. Have it your way, pal.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Sarah Palin - myths and reality - The video

Hi there! We're the sipmac team, we want the world and we want it now! We continue to expand through other venues, such as... video. Now we proudly present our Youtube channel, the jokerizepaul channel. Our goal is to post all the original material we can produce. This time, Paul Maršić, a.k.a. jokerizedpaul (yours truly) produces and presents a special report on Sarah Palin, the "perceived truth" and the reality. And the music.

Jokerizedpaul on Sarah Palin

by: jokerizedpaul





Enjoy!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Rupert Murdoch, boogeyman or antihero? I say: both of them.

By Dr. sipmac

It is inevitable the fact that everybody hates Rupert Murdoch; it’s in every person’s blood in this planet. What’s to hate about him, anyway? That he is a media mogul gazillionaire ironically self-described as a genocidal tyrant? That although News of the World was closed, he still owns a bunch of newspapers reeking of sleaze? That he’s continually lambasted in his own TV network sitcom “The Sipmsons” as an evil genius?

The list could go on, but the fact is that he’s in deep trouble by the News of the World hacking scandal. The day he spoke before the Parliament was considered by him “the most humble day of his life”. Additionally and in a lighter mood, he was attacked by a baker without borders sympathizer but the perpetrator promptly suffered the retaliation of Murdoch’s wife. Boy, she smacked hard that unsuspecting fool!

But I digress. Murdoch is nothing less than the boogeyman for the “respectable” media, that like to tell their customers how the free press is going to end if the dirty old man isn’t stopped on time. That’s what they say.

What they don’t say is that the very ones that demonize Murdoch (rubbing their hands with delight), obtain and print the news the same way Dear Leader does: The New York Times, the Washington Post and the Guardian (not to mention the BBC) use illegally obtained information to make a fortune by selling it. What, you don’t believe me? Doesn’t Wikileaks ring any bells for you? You seem to forget that the whole Wikileaks affair started with illegally obtained US diplomatic cables. Like it or not, the Pentagon Papers were illegally leaked, too. And so on.
The most hypocritical spin of all this should-be-not-such-a-big-scandal is that righteous indignation the media owners and reporters feel, forgetting that they use the same practices they are condemning now, but only when they see it fit. The BBC sat an entire month on the Climategate e-mails, knowing that a thorough investigation could have destroyed that house of cards that is Anthropogenic Global Warming, but they didn’t, because revealing the whole fiasco did not serve their agenda.

Yes, the Grey Lady, the WaPo, the Guardian and Auntie Beeb have their own agenda and it leans left. Most Murdoch media lean right and that’s something they can not accept nor forgive. The aborted SKY buyout was an attempt to create a strong competition that up to this moment the BBC does not have. Most people in the UK know the Quango as a natural part of the environment and don't know any better.

Julian Assange was treated as a martyr because of the perceivedly “bogus” legal charges filed against him, all while his leaker (Bradley Manning) faces serious prison-time. It is very likely that Assange will not serve any time and it wouldn’t be a surprise if he ever wins the Peace Nobel Price. And Murdoch, that really offers diversity and different points of view in the before-him homogenous media world, even if he walks scot-free from this News of the World Fiasco, he will always be the villain.


Surprisingly, the Britons are missing the deceased newspaper. Remember to give people what they want!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 20, 2010

Jon Stewart Joke Makes It Onto Glenn Beck's Book Jacket (PHOTO)


[Start rant]



It is not as absurd as you may think. To quote those blurbs, first from a newspaper that NEVER recognized in its time (the 1930's) the famine and mass murders of the stalinist soviet union and fails to recognize that cover up even now, then from a guy always willing to criticize Bush et al., but not the current president (truth to power!), well, if you consider those facts, then those blurbs are almost a badge of honor. That Beck guy may not be as kook and dumb as the MSM want to paint it, for sure.



[End rant]
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
Enhanced by Zemanta