Showing posts with label The Simpsons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Simpsons. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

The Sipmsons: Th-th-th-that’s all folks?

It’s like this: the main cast cashes 8 million per season each, then they get a paltry union mandated residual for reruns and syndication, but nothing else. The novelty and the freshness wore off a long time ago; hence the ratings are not what they used to be (a paltry third of its prime). The main cast boss is even more reviled than Charles Montgomery Burns and a standoff was unavoidable.

Dan Castellaneta (Homer, Grampa Simpson, Krusty the Clown, and others), Julie Kavner (Marge and others), Nancy Cartwright (Bart and others), Yeardley Smith (Lisa), Hank Azaria (Moe Szyslak, Chief Wiggum and Apu Nahasapeemapetilon), and Harry Shearer (Mr. Burns, Principal Skinner, Ned Flanders, and others) each earn about $8 million annually for about 22 weeks’ work. Fox offered a 45% pay cut with absolutely no sweeteners. The counteroffer took the form of a 30% cut with a tiny fraction of all the huge back-end profits the network receives from syndication and franchising. Fox said no way.

In the end, after 500 episodes and absolutely no fear of diluting a winning franchise, Fox says it’s not afraid of axing the longest running series in American TV history, either.

I say it’s about time.

The Simpsons and I parted ways the season when Homer and Marge ate uranium and Bart ate tomacco. I found the movie okay and that was pretty much it. It’s sad the animated sitcom didn’t find its Great Gazoo that would mercifully kill it, so that the memories of seven or eight good seasons could be preserved. But no, we have to endure craptacular irritating annoyance season after season in order to appreciate only two good quality episodes.

I cannot understand why people are raving mad about the series cancellation; even now we’re not sure if this is not a gimmick to embig a little bit the ratings. I cannot understand the twitter threads. I cannot understand the facebook frenzy. 500 episodes is not enough?

Another fact is that The Simpsons were so groundbreaking that they had to take the same path of Citizen Kane and Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. They became revered artifacts but are not paid attention anymore. Don’t you think so? South Park is experiencing some of the same problems now; hey, even Family Guy is more interesting and funnier now (it will take the same path eventually).

The Simpsons started with the truly remarkable ambition of being more realistic than any flesh-and-blood sitcom of its time (Family Ties and The Cosby Show were on the crosshairs). It succeeded. Then it departed from its initial goal having already changed pop culture forever; while the new flesh-and-blood sitcoms tried to capture its irreverence and joie de vivre, The Simpsons began its slow demise into irrelevance. By having a huge and loyal following, nobody noticed this.

It should have ended with a bang. Instead, the acrimony of a nasty divorce takes the spotlight instead of the series.


And no catchphrase will lighten me up now. Meh, indeed.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Touchy Europe does not want to see "Simpson's" nuclear references

Europe Removes Nuclear Power Plant Themes From 'The Simpsons' - Starpulse.com It's a little bit of ironic, since one of the longest running gags of the 21-year old cartoon-sitcom is Homer Simpson's colossal ineptitude as the Springfield Nuclear Plant security technician. This already took its toll: Frank Grimes went insane because of it, and quickly found his death inside the plant.

Fortunately, this has anything to do with the leitmotiv... er, main motivation of this blog, nor its main source of inspiration (hahahahHAHAHA! ¡sip has so much good taste!). But if Dr. sipmac were living nearby a nuclear plant in Europe, he could feel the fear, too. (A mineshaft could be handy, BTW). In the meanswhile, a sip... er, a "Simpsons'" joke could be extremely unsensitive ("Do not mention the rope at the house of the hangman").
Since his involvement in that documentary, he knows for sure that, if there's is going to be a cataclismic accident, it's going to be caused by plain tomfoolery, not evil nor greed. However... HOWEVER, it is being said that the true origin of all the Fukushima disaster was the concealed lack of manteinance in the plants. To keep the books in the black, some dark maneuvers like employees' lay-offs and embezzelment of manteninance reports were done. And it was already known in Japan before the quake. Meanness and greed have a role to play, after all.

It makes you think. A lot.
Enhanced by Zemanta