Monday, January 24, 2011

Tales from the Wikipedia Trash Can 7: Green Ink

Because a good franchise will never die, the Wikipedia Trash Can Series makes a comeback in 2011! It appears that a "serious" encyclopedia cannot show even the slightest attempt at humor and frivolity, not to mention neutrality, God forbid! Oops... too late. Well, without further ado, another Wikipedia entry nixed by Jimbo Wales' moronic rules:

Green Ink


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In British journalism, green ink is used to describe written correspondence from self-aggrandising pedants, cranks, charlatans and eccentrics, or from the clearly mentally ill. The term derives from correspondents who enclose cuttings from the newspaper they are writing to, with contentious points ringed or underlined in coloured ink.

Regardless of the colour of ink used (there is little evidence of correspondence actually in green ink), it is common to refer to correspondence of any kind (including email and webpages) as being in "green ink", if it broadly fits the following identifying characteristics of Stridency, Impertinence, Unreasonableness, Unrealism, Fancifulness and Obsessiveness.[citation needed] Writers and correspondents who fit this general profile are referred to as "Green Inkers" or as members of the "Green Ink Brigade" (GIB). The term "Green Biro Brigade" is also used occasionally.


Common comorbid characteristics include irrelevant capitalisation, religious mania overuse of exclamation marks and veiled threats or warnings directed at the recipient.
The "letters" guidelines for the British newspaper The Observer (semi-humorously) stipulate avoidance of green ink.

Contents

* 1 Possible origins
* 2 See also
* 3 Notes

* 4 External links


Possible origins


Sir Mansfield Cumming, the first chief of MI6, would only write memoranda and communications in green ink – a tradition that has been continued by all subsequent placeholders.
Green ink was also the way in which the guardian of an underage Roman Emperor would sign his charge's correspondences.

See also

* Crank (person)

* Rant
* Thought disorder

Notes

1. "Northern Echo, 2006-05-29". Archive.thenorthernecho.co.uk. 2006-05-29. http://archive.thenorthernecho.co.uk/2006/5/29/227000.html. Retrieved 2010-09-01.
2. Mark Lawson (2007-09-13). "Mark Lawson, Guardian Unlimited". London: Blogs.guardian.co.uk. http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/tv/2007/09/tv_matters_tragedy_and_fiction.html. Retrieved 2010-09-01. 3. "Irish News via Newshound". Nuzhound.com. http://www.nuzhound.com/articles/irish_news/arts2006/jan19_peace_process_pilots_heads_in_clouds__NEmerson.php. Retrieved 2010-09-01. 4. So, you want to write to the editor (Stephen Pritchard, The Observer, 3 February 2002) 5. UK Politics 286128 at news.bbc.co.uk 6. Alexander Allen, Ph.D, "Atramentum". A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, William Smith, D.C.L., LL.D (ed.), John Murray, London, 1875.

The original entry had a much richer text than the one that appears here. More datacide brought to you by Wikipedia, because...


For a journalist it might be someone from the Green Ink Brigade, but for us is a blogger, for sure.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 23, 2011

College Scam Still in Progress - Bubble about to burst?

KTAR.com - Student tracking finds limited learning in college.

Back in the old days, when Dr. sipmac could use less suspicion to read the press, he found an appalling article in Time Magazine, so that he couldn't believe his eyes. It was an excerpt of the William Henry III book "In Defense of Elitism", in which he explained the obvious decay in the quality of the college education by a very powerful example: her mother went to a then-considered lightweight university, and to master a Shakespeare course she had to read all the 37 plays knowingly written by the bard, while at the time he was writing his book, a mere 4 basic plays were enough for a "Shakespeare course".

This dismal way to teach college students was Mr. Henry's reason to call for elitism in college admissions, since he felt college education was being dumbed down to facilitate the admission of unworthy students. What an unfortunate choice of word! Dr. sipmac somewhat feels the right term the late Mr. Henry's was looking for was not elitism but excellence. It is (still) not a crime to yearn for excellence in all the areas of human knowledge, and little by little is being recognized the huge decline in education quality at all levels. When you spend a good $ 80.000 to $ 160.000 in a college education with serious flaws that could lead to no job qualification after graduation, well you can fairly assess there is a huge scam in progress with the american higher education system, that maybe reflects what is happening in other parts of the globe.
That kind of light load sounded familiar to University of Missouri freshman Julia Rheinecker, who said her first semester of college largely duplicated the work she completed back home in southern Illinois.

"I'm not going to lie," she said. "Most of what I learned this year I already had in high school. It was almost easier my first semester (in college)."
Studying in a university is supposed to be hard, not fun and games. More like "Paper Chase" and less than "Animal House" (as hilarious as it can be, but Senator Blutarsky couln't have a chance in real life, i.e. in his student era). Dr. sipmac really can't see the justification of this cockamamie charade that sinks year after year entire households in debt and seems to serve only to keep estranged-from-reality professors and directing boards making more than a dollar.

Excellence, knowing more, not less. Learning what I need to succeed, not what I need to feel comfortable. Rigorous research and science, not indoctrination disguised as objective knowledge. More education for your hard-earned money, not an outright rip-off.

Sure Dr. sipmac is not saying anything new, but if what he says is so obvious (duh), then why isn't anybody ending this scam?


A debate should be on its way.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Westboro Baptist Church to picket funeral of 9-year-old Tucson shooting victim

West Westboro Baptist Church to picket funeral of 9-year-old Tucson shooting victim - National Libertarian | Examiner.com

Well, well, look what the cat dragged in! From the creators of godhatesfags.com, your favorite troublemakers, the buffons of the Westboro Baptist Church, decided to bring a brand new low to bad taste and despicable public behavior: they are going to disrupt the funeral of Christina Green, a 9-year old girl killed by none other that Jared Lee Loughner.

I think some inflammatory rethoric is allowed in cases like these. Starting right now: Do they have any shame? Why do they want to be hated like this? Fred Phelps and company must be really out of their frickin' minds! If hell didn't exist, it should exist for the mere purpose to punish this unbelievable out and out, deranged attitude of the demonstrators, who put the demon in demonstrators.

Leave the poor girl and her family alone. Go home, you sick, perverted freaks. And don't you dare to use the name of God to justify this.
Enhanced by Zemanta